NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : ALEXANDER ECHT and IRIS TERESA ECHT v. RYDE CITY COUNCIL (21 August 1998) [1998] NSWLEC 4 Applicants: Alexander Echt and Iris Teresa Echt PARTIES : First Respondent Ryde City Council Second Respondents: TI Shallita and DM Shallita FILE NUMBER(S) : 40074 of 1998 CORAM: Cowdroy J KEY ISSUES: :- LEGISLATION CITED: Local Government Act 1993 s 124 Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Peek v New South Wales Egg Corporation [1985-1986] 6 NSWLR 1;; Attorney General v Harris [1961] 1 QB 74 at p 94;; Warringah Shire Council v Sedevcic (1987) 63 LGRA 361); CASES CITED: Clough v Radcliffe [1847] 1 De G & S 164 at 178-9; 63 ER 1016); Attorney General v Australian Softwood Forest Pty Ltd (1981) 36 ALR 257; Corkill v Forestry Commission of New South Wales [No 2] (1991) 73 LGRA 126 ; Forestry Commission of New South Wales v Corkill (1989) 73 LGRA 247 DATES OF HEARING: 18 August 1998 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 08/21/1998
Mr C R Ireland (Solicitor) LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: Ms S A Duggan (Barrister) Mr A R D'Angelo (Solicitor)
JUDGMENT:
Contents Page Institution of Proceedings 3 The Present State 4 The Findings 4 The Relief 6 Costs 8
IN THE LAND AND MATTER No. 40074 of 1998
ENVIRONMENT COURT CORAM: Cowdroy AJ
OF NEW SOUTH WALES DECISION DATE: 21 August 1998
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate