NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : (2007) 160 LGERA 1
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Tegra (NSW) Pty Limited v Gundagai Shire Council and Anor [2007] NSWLEC 806
APPLICANT Tegra (NSW) Pty Limited
PARTIES : FIRST RESPONDENT Gundagai Shire Council
SECOND RESPONDENT Martin Hay Plant Hire & Earthmoving Pty Ltd
FILE NUMBER(S) : 41166 of 2007
CORAM: Preston CJ
KEY ISSUES: Injunctions and Declarations :- interlocutory injunction - application to restrain carrying out of quarry in accordance with development consent - principles governing grant of interlocutory injunction - serious questions to be tried as to breach of statutory provisions for notification before and after grant of consent and in grant of consent - balance of convenience - factors discussed - balance of convenience favours not granting interlocutory injunction
Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 s 77A, s 78A, s 79, s 79C s 81, s 97, s 98, s 123, s 124 LEGISLATION CITED: Rivers and Foreshores Improvement Act 1948 Part 3A Land and Environment Court Act 1979 s 20(2)
American Cyanamid Co v Ethicon Ltd [1975] AC 396; Armidale Local Aboriginal Land Council v Transgrid [2000] NSWLEC 141 (17 May 2000); Attorney-General v Guardian Newspapers Ltd [1987] 1 WLR 1248; Australian Broadcasting Commission v Lenah Game Meats Pty Limited (2001) 208 CLR 199 at 218; Baulkham Hills Shire Council v Dix Gardner Pty Ltd [2004] NSWLEC 271 (4 May 2004); Beecham Group Ltd v Bristol Laboratories Pty Limited (1968) 118 CLR 618; Blacktown City Council v Wilkie [2001] NSWLEC 91 (6 March 2001); Botany Municipal Council & Ors v Minister of State for Transport and Regional Development & Ors (1996) 90 LGERA 81; Bridgetown/Greenbushes Friends of the Forest Inc v Department of Conservation and Land Management (1997) 93 LGRA 436; Bush v Minister for Local Government (2002) 124 LGERA 256; Calvin v Carr [1980] AC 574; Carriage v Stockland (Constructors) Pty Ltd [2002] NSWLEC 117 (16 July 2002); Carriage v Stockland (Constructors) Pty Ltd [2002] NSWLEC 216 (20 November 2002); Carriage v Stockland Development Pty Ltd [2004] NSWLEC 320 (22 April 2004); Castlemaine Tooheys Ltd v State of South Australia (1986) 161 CLR 148; Corkill v Forestry Commission of NSW (1990) 71 LGRA 116; Donnelly v Amalgamated Television Services Pty Ltd (1998) 45 NSWLR 570; Ellison v Warringah Shire Council (1985) 55 LGRA 1; Films Rover International Ltd v Cannon Film Sales Ltd [1986] 3 All ER 772; Garden Cottage Foods Ltd v Milk Marketing Board [1984] 1 AC 130; Harold Stephen & Co Ltd v Post Office [1977] 1 WLR 1172; Heavener v Loomes (1924) 34 CLR 306; Hubbard v Vosper [1972] 2 QB 84; CASES CITED: Jarasius v Forestry Commission of NSW (1989) 69 LGRA 156; Kolback Securities Ltd v Epoch Mining NL (1987) 8 NSWLR 533 ; Liquorland (Aust) Pty Ltd v Anghie (2002) 20 ACLC 58; Marrickville Council v G & K Psakis Pty Ltd [2004] NSWLEC 663 (1 December 2004); Melville v Craig Nowlan & Associates Pty Ltd (2001) 54 NSWLR 82; Metroll Victoria Pty Ltd v Wyndham City Council (2007) 152 LGERA 437; Optus Networks Pty Ltd v Stonnington City Council [1996] 2 VR 209; Oshlack v Richmond River Shire Council (1994) 82 LGERA 236; Parker v Camden London Borough Council [1986] 1 Ch 162; Perrey v Mordiesel Co Pty Ltd [1976] VR 569; Preston v Luck (1884) 27 Ch D 497; Reg v Secretary of State for Transport, ex parte Factortame Ltd (No 2), [1991] 1 AC 603; Richardson v Forestry Commission (1987) 73 ALR 589 ; Ross v State Rail Authority of NSW (1987) 70 LGRA 91; Shepherd Homes Ltd v Sandham [1971] Ch 340; Silktone Pty Ltd v Devreal Capital Pty Ltd (1990) 21 NSWLR 317 ; South Sydney City Council v Rennoc Australia Pty Ltd [2003] NSWLEC 45 (29 November 2002); Tableland Peanuts Pty Ltd v Peanut Marketing Board (1984) 58 ALJR 283; Tsimidopoulos v Mulson Holdings Pty Ltd (1989) 1 WAR 359; Warner Bros Pictures Inc v Nelson [1937] 1 KB 209; Warringah Shire Council v Sedevcic (1987) 10 NSWLR 335; Water Administration Ministerial Corporation v Auburn Council [2000] NSWLEC 76 (18 April 2000); Waverley Council v Ligertwood [2003] NSWLEC 172 (5 June 2003); Williams v Homestake Australia Ltd (2002) 119 LGERA 55; Williams v Director General of National Parks and Wildlife Service [2002] NSWLEC 235 (6 December 2002)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate