NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Waite v Blacktown City Council [2008] NSWLEC 1130
APPLICANT David Waite PARTIES : RESPONDENT Blacktown City Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 11305 of 2007
CORAM: Hoffman C
KEY ISSUES: Development Application :- to extend an existing rural shed
LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
DATES OF HEARING: 07/03/2008
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 7 March 2008
APPLICANT Mr D. P. Williams, solicitor of Whitehead Cooper Williams LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:
RESPONDENT Mr T. O'Connor, solicitor of Houston Dearn O'Connor
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Hoffman C
7 March 2008
11305 of 2007 David Waite v Blacktown City Council
JUDGMENT 1 This is a Class 1 Appeal No. 11305 of 2007 between David Waite and Blacktown City Council in regard to the refusal of a proposal to extend an existing rural shed at Lot 4 DP17048 being No. 879 Richmond Road, Marsden Park.
2 There already exists on the site that is 2.875 hectares in size, two existing residences, five existing sheds including one large rural shed facing Richmond Road which is currently used as a produce store. The extension which is about 12 metres by 12 metres in size is to be added to this large rural shed which would be approximately 45 metres by 25 metres at the current time.
3 The council had no concern over the fact of the extension, it was simply that the applicant did not supply adequate drawings and specifications so that the council could properly assess it. After several requests for the additional information and it not being supplied, council refused the proposal on 26 November 2007.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate