NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Walker Corporation Pty Ltd v Sydney Harbour Foreshore Authority [2007] NSWLEC 304
APPLICANT Walker Corporation Pty Ltd PARTIES : RESPONDENT Sydney Harbour Foreshore Authority
FILE NUMBER(S) : 30024 of 2003
CORAM: Talbot J
KEY ISSUES: Practice and Procedure :- Whether further hearing to proceed on reserved pending High Court appeal
DATES OF HEARING: 29/05/2007
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 31 May 2007
APPLICANT Mr Webster SC SOLICITORS Minter Ellison LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:
RESPONDENT Mr Galasso SC SOLICITORS Deacons
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Talbot J
31 May 2007
30024 of 2003 Walker Corporation Pty Ltd v Sydney Harbour Foreshore Authority
JUDGMENT 1 Talbot J: Following two appeals to the Court of Appeal from earlier decisions of this Court, the High Court has now granted leave to appeal in respect of both decisions by the Court of Appeal. It is not expected that the High Court appeals will be heard prior to dates set aside in June for a hearing on the latest remitter of the matter to this Court by the Court of Appeal. As the issues to be argued in the High Court relate only to the prospect of a residential zoning being in place or relevantly imminent at the date of resumption, it is submitted by the applicant that the Court should use the dates in June to determine issues not decided in the first instance, namely the value of the resumed land at the date of acquisition on each of: a) The basis of existing use rights b) The basis of State Environmental Planning Policy No. 5 – Housing for Older People or People with a Disability [SEPP 5] and c) An industrial basis. 2 When this Court originally determined the amount of compensation based on a zoning that permitted residential development of the land, it did not proceed to determine the value on the alternative bases mentioned above, as there would be no perceived utility in doing so. 3 Contrary to the Applicant's submissions, the Respondent has filed a Notice of Motion seeking orders that:- 1. The hearing dates of 25 to 29 June be vacated.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate