NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Leahy v Godbier; Horvath v Godbier [2007] NSWLEC 313
APPLICANTS - FIRST MATTER Ken & Christine Leahy
PARTIES : APPLICANTS - SECOND MATTER Vidor & Sue Horvath
RESPONDENTS - BOTH MATTERS David & Barbara Godbier
FILE NUMBER(S) : 20154 and 20155 of 2007
CORAM: Fakes AC - Moore C
KEY ISSUES: Trees (Neighbours) - Neighbour Application :-
LEGISLATION CITED: Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006
CASES CITED: Barker v Kyriakides [2007] NSWLEC 292
DATES OF HEARING: 1 June 2007
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 1 June 2007
APPLICANTS In person (both matters) LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENTS In person
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
FAKES AC MOORE C
1 June 2007
07/20154 Ken & Christine Leahy v David & Barbara Godbier
07/20155 Vidor & Sue Horvath v David & Barbara Godbier
JUDGMENT
This decision was given as an extemporaneous decision. It has been revised and edited prior to publication. 1 COMMISSIONER FAKES: These are applications pursuant to s 7 of the Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 (the Act), concerning two trees located on a property at 27 Margaret Street, Cootamundra. Mr and Mrs Godbier own this property.
2 The trees are mature Southern Blue Gums (Eucalyptus globulus). Both trees were present and well established when the Leahy and Godbier dwellings were built about 30 to 35 years ago.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate