NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Baulkham Hills Shire Council v Stankovic (No 3) [2008] NSWLEC 266
APPLICANT PARTIES : Baulkham Hills Shire Council RESPONDENT Milovan Stankovic
FILE NUMBER(S) : 41243 of 2004
CORAM: Pain J
KEY ISSUES: Civil Enforcement :- exercise of discretion - whether consequential orders for removal of material ought be made
Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 s121, s124 LEGISLATION CITED: Local Government Act 1993 s678(10) Land and Environment Court Act 1979 s20, s22, s23
Baulkham Hills Shire Council v Stankovic [2005] NSWLEC 110 Baulkham Hills Shire Council v Stankovic (No 2) [2007] NSWLEC 870 Coco v R (1994) 179 CLR 427 CASES CITED: F Hannan Pty Ltd v Electricity Commission of New South Wales [No 3] (1985) 66 LGRA 306 Hillpalm Pty Ltd v Heavens Door Pty Ltd (2004) 220 CLR 472 Ku-Ring-Gai v Labordus [2007] NSWLEC 834 Warringah Shire Council v Sedevcic (1987) 10 NSWLR 335
TEXTS CITED: Pearce, Geddes, Statutory Interpretation in Australia, 6th ed (Sydney: LexisNexis Butterworths, 2006)
28 July 2008 DATES OF HEARING: 29 July 2008 1 August 2008
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 18 September 2008
APPLICANT Mr G Newport SOLICITORS LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: Baulkham Hills Shire Council
RESPONDENT In person
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate