NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Agostino v Penrith City Council [2009] NSWLEC 76
APPLICANT PARTIES : Antonio and Barbara Agostino RESPONDENT Penrith City Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10015 of 2009
CORAM: Pain J
KEY ISSUES: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS :- preliminary point of law in class 1 proceedings - whether LEP control is a development standard
LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 s 4 Penrith Local Environmental Plan No 201 (Rural Lands) cl 9, 18, 41, 42
Agostino v Penrith City Council (2002) 123 LGERA 305 Blue Mountains City Council v Laurence Browning Pty Ltd (2006) 150 LGERA 130 Lowy v Land and Environment Court of New South Wales (2002) 123 LGERA 179 Marzouk v Penrith City Council [2007] NSWLEC 415 North Sydney Municipal Council v PD Mayoh Pty Ltd (No 2) (1990) 71 LGRA 222 CASES CITED: Residents Against Improper Development Inc v Chase Property Investments Pty Ltd (2006) 149 LGERA 360 Segal v Waverley Council (2005) 64 NSWLR 177 Shire of Perth v O'Keefe (1964) 110 CLR 529 Strathfield Municipal Council v Poynting (2001) 116 LGERA 319 Warlam Pty Ltd v Marrickville Council [2009] NSWLEC 23 Woollahra Municipal Council v Carr (1987) 62 LGRA 263
DATES OF HEARING: 28 April 2009
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 4 June 2009
APPLICANT Ms S Duggan SOLICITORS LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: Conomos Legal RESPONDENT Mr C Drury (solicitor) SOLICITORS DLA Phillips Fox
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate