NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Gray v Minister for Planning & Ors (No 2) [2007] NSWLEC 91
APPLICANT Peter Gray FIRST RESPONDENT PARTIES : Minister for Planning SECOND RESPONDENT Director-Genral of the Department of Planning THIRD RESPONDENT Centennial Hunter Pty Ltd
FILE NUMBER(S) : 40870 of 2006
CORAM: Pain J
KEY ISSUES: Costs :- exercise of discretion to award costs in contested Class 4 proceedings
LEGISLATION CITED: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 s 69(2)
Armstrong v Landmark Corporation Ltd [1967] 1 NSWR 13; Cutcliffe v Lithgow City Council [2006] NSWLEC 463; GPT Re Ltd v Wollongong City Council [2006] NSWLEC 658; CASES CITED: Farah v Warringah Council and Ors [2006] NSWLEC 544; Gray v The Minister for Planning and Ors [2006] NSWLEC 720; Oshlack v Richmond River Council (1998) 193 CLR 72 ; Rosniak v Government Insurance Office (1997) 41 NSWLR 608; Waters v PC Henderson (Australia) Pty Ltd (NSWCA, 6 July 1994, unreported)
DATES OF HEARING: 22 February 2007
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 27 February 2007
APPLICANT Mr N Perram SC Mr A Crossland SOLICITORS Woolf and Associates FIRST RESPONDENT No appearance LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: SECOND RESPONDENT Mr J Kirk SOLICITORS Department of Planning, Legal Services Branch THIRD RESPONDENT Mr M Brennan (solicitor) SOLICITORS Blake Dawson Waldron
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate