NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Lines v Shanks [2009] NSWLEC 1433
APPLICANT Jeffrey Lines PARTIES : RESPONDENT Phillip and Angie Shanks
FILE NUMBER(S) : 20734 of 2009
CORAM: Fakes C
KEY ISSUES: TREES (NEIGHBOURS) :- removal of the three trees, risk of injury to people and damage to property.
LEGISLATION CITED: Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006
Robson v Leischke [2008] LEC 152 CASES CITED: Barker v Kyriakides [2007] NSWLEC 292 Yang v Scerri [2007] NSWLEC 592
DATES OF HEARING: 16 December 2009
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 16 December 2009
APPLICANT Mr J Lines (litigant in person) LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:
RESPONDENT Mr P and Mrs A Shanks (litigants in person)
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Fakes C
16 December 2009
20734 of 2009 Jeffrey Lines v Phillip and Angie Shanks
JUDGMENT
This decision was given as an extemporaneous decision. It has been revised and edited prior to publication.
1 COMMISSIONER: This is an application pursuant to s 7 of the Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 made by Mr Jeffrey Lines of 6 Delasala Drive Macquarie Hills against the owners of three trees growing at 6 Delasala Drive. The owners of that property are Phillip and Angie Shanks.
2 The applicant is seeking the removal of the three trees as he contends that they pose a risk of injury to people and damage to property. In particular Mr Lines is concerned about the proximity to his house of a large eucalypt. He also contends that roots from the trees have blocked and could continue to block his sewer. He is also concerned about the mess from leaves falling onto his property and the potential fire risk that they pose. One of the trees is a Camphor Laurel that the applicant contends should be removed as it is a 'noxious' weed.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate