NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Cachia v O'Connor [2008] NSWLEC 1278
PARTIES : Laurence Cachia v Michael O'Connor
FILE NUMBER(S) : 20472 of 2008
CORAM: Moore C - Thyer AC
KEY ISSUES: Jurisdiction - Trees (Neighbours) :-
LEGISLATION CITED: Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006
Wyong Shire Council v Shirt (1980) 146 CLR 40 CASES CITED: Yang v Scerri [2007] NSWLEC 592 Nair v Edwards [2006] NSWSC 1310
DATES OF HEARING: 3 July 2008
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 3 July 2008
APPLICANT In person LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT In person
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
MOORE C THYER AC
3 July 2008
08/20472 Laurence Cachia v Michael O'Connor
JUDGMENT
This decision was given as an extemporaneous decision. It has been revised and edited prior to publication. Formal case references have also been added.
1 COMMISSIONERS: In April 2008, McLaughlin AsJ in the Supreme Court ordered the transfer to the Land and Environment Court of an application concerning a tree located on Mr O'Connor's property. This tree had been amongst a number of matters concerning Mr O'Connor's property subject of an application by Mr Cachia to the Supreme Court (SC Matter No: 5565 of 2007). His Honour held that the Supreme Court did not have jurisdiction to deal with any of the elements for which Mr Cachia claimed relief – dismissing two of them and transferring the other to be dealt with by the Land and Environment Court pursuant to the Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate