NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Kogarah Municipal Council v. Pronsa Pty Limited [1998] NSWLEC 116 APPLICANT Kogarah Municipal Council
FIRST RESPONDENT Pronsa Pty Ltd PARTIES : SECOND RESPONDENT David Copps Mckay and Valda Dorothy Mckay
THIRD RESPONDENT Botany Bay Yacht Club Ltd FILE NUMBER(S) : 40065 of 1998 CORAM: Cowdroy J KEY ISSUES: :- LEGISLATION CITED: Rules of the Supreme Court 1970 pt 13 r 5 Land and Environment Court Rules 1996 pt 6 r1 Thoday v Thoday [1964] P.181 at 197-198; Carl Zeiss Stiftung v Rayner & Keeler Limited [1967] 1 AC 853; Blair & Ors v Curran & Ors (1939) 62 CLR 464; Jackson v Goldsmith (1950) 81 CLR 446 at 466 per Fullagar J; Bayne v Blake (1909) 9 CLR 366; Clarke v Darley (1898) 14 WN (NSW) 129; Dyson v Attorney General [1911] 1 KB 410 at 418, 419, CA,; CASES CITED: Metropolitan Bank v Pooley (1885) 10 App Cas 210 at 220, 221, HL; Jago v District Court of New South Wales (1989) 168 CLR 23; Re Majory [1955] Ch 600 at 623-4; Hunter v Chief Constable of West Midlands Police [1982] AC 529 at 534; Mills v Cooper [1967] 2 QB 459; SCI Operations Pty Limited & Anor v Trade Practices Commission & Ors (1984) 53 ALR 283 at 348; Petree v Knox (1918) 35 WN (NSW) 32 ; Lovell v Williams Vol 62 Ll R 249.; Charles Forte Investments Ltd v Amanda [1964] 1 Ch 240 per Wilmer LJ at p 252 DATES OF HEARING: 17/08/98 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 08/28/1998
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate