NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : F & D Bonaccorso Pty Limited v Canada Bay City Council [2007] NSWLEC 233
APPLICANT: F & D Bonaccorso Pty Ltd
FIRST RESPONDENT: City of Canada Bay City Council
SECOND RESPONDENT: Arinson Pty Ltd PARTIES : THIRD RESPONDENT: Omaya Holding Pty Ltd
FOURTH RESPONDENT: Omaya Investments Pty Ltd
FIFTH RESPONDENT: The Registrar General
FILE NUMBER(S) : 40134 of 2003
CORAM: Biscoe J
KEY ISSUES: Development Consent :- invalidity conceded by respondent on one ground – applicant seeking to press further alleged grounds of invalidity – whether sufficient utility in permitting that course.
LEGISLATION CITED: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 s 124 Local Government Act 1993 s 676
CASES CITED: Humane Society International Inc v Kyodo Senpaku Kaisha Limited [2006] 154 FCR 425
DATES OF HEARING: 7 March 2007
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 7 March 2007
APPLICANT: Mr B Coles QC and Mr J Doyle, barrister
SOLICITORS Thomson Playford
FIRST RESPONDENT: Dr J Griffith SC and Mr S Free LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: FIFTH RESPONDENT: Mr P Walsh
SOLICITORS:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate