NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Spillane v Burgess [2009] NSWLEC 1289
APPLICANTS D & J Spillane PARTIES : RESPONDENTS S & T Burgess
FILE NUMBER(S) : 20194 of 2009
CORAM: Moore SC - Fakes AC
KEY ISSUES: COMPENSATION - TREES (NEIGHBOURS) :-
LEGISLATION CITED: Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005
CASES CITED: Robson v Leischke [2008] NSWLEC 152; (2008) 72 NSWLR 98; (2008) 159 LGERA 280
DATES OF HEARING: 17 July 2009
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 17 July 2009
APPLICANTS In person LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENTS In person
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
MOORE SC FAKES AC
17 July 2009
20194 of 2009 D & J Spillane v S & T Burgess
JUDGMENT
This decision was given as an extemporaneous decision. It has been revised and edited prior to publication. 1 SENIOR COMMISSIONER: This is an application made pursuant to the Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 (the Trees Act) by Mr and Mrs Spillane concerning a number of trees that are located on Mr and Mrs Burgess's property adjacent to their house.
2 The trees are located toward the rear of the two dwellings and are separated from the Spillane house by the width of the driveway on Mr and Mrs Spillane's property. The trees are a metre or so inside the fence – which, for the purposes of these proceedings and by agreement, we are treating as being the boundary between the properties (although we have no survey to that effect).
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate