NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Reuben v Lace [2010] NSWLEC 1024
APPLICANT T Reuben PARTIES : RESPONDENTS R & R Lace
FILE NUMBER(S) : 20732 of 2009
CORAM: Moore SC - Fakes C
KEY ISSUES: TREES (NEIGHBOURS) :-
LEGISLATION CITED: Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006
Aon Risk Services Australia Limited v Australian National University [2009] HCA 27 CASES CITED: Yang v Scerri [2007] NSWLEC 592 Black v Johnson (No 2) [2007] NSWLEC 513
DATES OF HEARING: 27 January 2010
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 27 January 2010
APPLICANT In person LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENTS Ms L Lace, agent
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
MOORE SC FAKES C
27 January 2010
20732 of 2009 Reuben v Lace
JUDGMENT
This decision was given as an extemporaneous decision. It has been revised and edited prior to publication. 1 SENIOR COMMISSIONER: In October 2009, Ms Reuben lodged an application with the Court concerning a number of trees located on the adjacent property owned by Mr and Mrs Lace. There are a number of procedural matters that arise that require to be dealt with prior to turning our attention to the merits of the matter.
2 The first of these is that the property is jointly owned by Mr and Mrs Lace and Mrs Lace has been, at all relevant times, a patient in a mental health institution and unable to take any informed part of the court process. When the matter was initially drawn to my attention, at the call-over hearing, Mr Lace was represented by his daughter and it was suggested, at that time, that the question of Mrs Lace's participation would be dealt with at the time of the on-site hearing in light of her then circumstances and whether or not any guardian had been appointed to represent her separate interests in the proceedings.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate