NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Port Macquarie – Hastings Council v Lawlor Services Pty Limited; Port Macquarie – Hastings Council v Petro (No 2) [2007] NSWLEC 324
PROSECUTOR Port Macquarie – Hastings Council PARTIES : FIRST DEFENDANT Lawlor Services Pty Limited SECOND DEFENDANT Edmund Petro
FILE NUMBER(S) : 50031 of 2006, 50006 of 2007
CORAM: Pain J
KEY ISSUES: Evidence :- whether order should be made under s38(1) of the Evidence Act 1995 to allow prosecution to cross-examine its own witness
LEGISLATION CITED: Evidence Act 1995 s 38, s 135, s 137, s142, s192(2)
Adam v The Queen [2001] 207 CLR 96; Hadgkiss v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2006] FCA 941; Klewer v Walton [2003] NSWCA 308; R v Ashton 2003 143 A Crim R 354; CASES CITED: R v Hogan [2001] NSWCCA 292; R v Kneebone (1999) 47 NSWLR 450; R v Le [2001] NSWSC 174; R v Le (2002) 54 NSWLR 474; R v Souleyman (1996) 40 NSWLR 712.
31 May 2007 DATES OF HEARING: 1 June 2007 4 June 2007
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 5 June 2007
PROSECUTOR Mr I Hemmings SOLICITOR Donovan Oates Hannaford FIRST DEFENDANT LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: Mr J Maston SOLICITOR Falvey Associates SECOND DEFENDANT Mr T Hale SC SOLICITOR Falvey Associates
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate