NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Kiernicki v Couto [2008] NSWLEC 1515
APPLICANT Mr H. Kiernicki PARTIES : RESPONDENT M. P. Couto
FILE NUMBER(S) : 21043 of 2008
CORAM: Thyer AC
KEY ISSUES: Trees (Neighbours) :- Orders made to remedy dispute in accordance with powers in s 9 of the Act, where survey shows situation of the tree to be on the applicant's property, not on the respondent's property as previously accepted by both parties.
LEGISLATION CITED: Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006
CASES CITED: Yang v Scerri [2007]NSWLEC 592 Nair v Edwards [2006] NSWSC 1310
DATES OF HEARING: 10/12/2008
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 10 December 2008
APPLICANT Mr H. Kiernicki, litigant in person LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:
RESPONDENT M. P. Couto, litigant in person
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Thyer AC
10 December 2008
21043 of 2008 Kiernicki v Couto
JUDGMENT The extemporaneous decision was given on 10 December 2008. This written judgment has been edited and includes relevant observations and background information. 1 ACTING COMMISSIONER: This application was made by Mr Kiernicki, owner of 3 Emma Place, Ambarvale. The application concerns six trees that Mr Kiernicki claimed were situated on 5 Emma Place, Ambarvale, the adjoining property to the east owned by Ms Couto. The trees are growing close to the dividing fence, on Ms Couto's side of the fence. Adopting the tree numbering used in the TALC arboricultural report dated 8 July 2008, the trees in order from the rear of the property to the street are; 1. Radiata pine, 2. Cypress, 3. Cypress, 4. Eucalyptus, 5. Wild Olive, 6. Grevillea.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate