NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Gough v O'Sullivan [2009] NSWLEC 1341 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
APPLICANT Beverley Gough PARTIES : RESPONDENT Maureen O'Sullivan
FILE NUMBER(S) : 20468 of 2009
CORAM: Fakes C
KEY ISSUES: TREES (NEIGHBOURS) :-
LEGISLATION CITED: Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006
CASES CITED: Gough v O'Sullivan [2009] NSWLEC 1027 Yang v Scerri [2007] NSWLEC 592
DATES OF HEARING: 8 October 2009
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 8 October 2009
APPLICANT In person LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT In person
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Fakes C 8 October 2009
20468 of 2009 Beverley Gough v Maureen O'Sullivan
JUDGMENT
This decision was given as an extemporaneous decision. It has been revised and edited prior to publication.
1 COMMISSIONER: This is an application pursuant to s 7 of the Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 made by Mrs Beverley Gough of 8/64A-66 Cambridge Street Penshurst against the owner of two trees growing in the rear garden of 4/62-64 Cambridge Street. The owner of that property is Ms Maureen O' Sullivan.
2 This is the second application under this Act made by Mrs Gough with respect to these trees. The first application was heard by AC Thyer on 15 January 2009 [Gough v O'Sullivan [2009] NSWLEC 1027]. AC Thyer made a number of orders relating to the trees, specifically that the respondent was to obtain a report from an AQF level 5 arborist as to the health, safety and structural stability of the trees and for the removal of all dead wood down to a diameter of 20 mm. A copy of the tree report was to be given to the applicant.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate