NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Ingham Planning Pty Ltd v Manly Council [2007] NSWLEC 247 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
APPLICANT Ingham Planning Pty Ltd PARTIES : RESPONDENT Manly Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 11008 of 2006
CORAM: Hoffman C
KEY ISSUES: Development Application :- replace an existing 4-storey building with a new 4-storey building, floor space ratio, density, wall height, side setbacks, streetscape, shadows, bulk/scale, privacy.
Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 State Environmental Planning Policy No 65 LEGISLATION CITED: State Environmental Planning Policy No 10 Manly Local Environmental Plan 1998 Manly Development Control Plan for the Residential Zones 2001
DATES OF HEARING: 21/03/2007 and 22/03/2007
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 4 May 2007
APPLICANT Mr C. McEwen, SC Instructed by Mr M. Staunton of Staunton and Beattie LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:
RESPONDENT Mr S. Griffiths, solicitor Instructed by Ms R. Vickers of Pike Pike and Fenwick
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Commissioner Hoffman
4 May 2007
11008 of 2006 Ingham Planning Pty Ltd v Manly Council
JUDGMENT 1 This is a Class1 Appeal No. 11008 of 2006 between Ingham Planning Pty Ltd and Manly council in regard to the deemed refusal of consent to demolish an existing 4-storey building containing 10 studio apartments and one cottage and a garage, and replace them with a new 4-storey building with only one apartment per floor and underground part-basement carpark for 6 cars plus one above ground visitor space at Nos. 11-13 The Crescent, Manly Cove.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate