NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Tenacity Investments Pty Ltd v Ku-ring-gai Council [2007] NSWLEC 535
APPLICANT: Tenacity Investments Pty Ltd
FIRST RESPONDENT: Ku-ring-gai Council
SECOND RESPONDENTS: Russell and Angela Cooke
THIRD RESPONDENTS: Vicki and Daniel Ming
FOURTH RESPONDENT: Peter Dobrijevic
FIFTH RESPONDENT: Yvonne Forsyth
PARTIES : SIXTH RESPONDENTS: Ivan and Janet Lum
SEVENTH RESPONDENTS: John and Virginia Hill
EIGHTH RESPONDENTS: Christopher and Aini Wong
NINTH RESPONDENTS: Patrick Lee and Liza Lam
TENTH RESPONDENT: Marina Brun-Smits
ELEVENTH RESPONDENTS: Gavin and Lynn Hucker
TWELFTH RESPONDENT: Steven and Gum You; Kwok and Sylvia Ng
FILE NUMBER(S) : 30688 of 2006
CORAM: Biscoe J
KEY ISSUES: Costs :- security for costs - factors relevant to exercise of discretion to order security for costs - whether security for costs should be rewarded and if so in what amount - whether risk that applicant would not be able to pay costs if respondent obtains costs order
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate