NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Crannis v Flood [2007] NSWLEC 503
APPLICANT Frederick Crannis PARTIES : RESPONDENT Terry Flood
FILE NUMBER(S) : 20564 of 2007
CORAM: Moore C
KEY ISSUES: Trees (Neighbours) - Neighbour Application :-
LEGISLATION CITED: Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006
DATES OF HEARING: 10 August 2007
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 10 August 2007
APPLICANT In person LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT In person
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
MOORE C
10 August 2007
07/20564 Frederick Crannis v Terry Flood
JUDGMENT
This decision was given as an extemporaneous decision. It has been revised and edited prior to publication. 1. COMMISSIONER: This is an application made pursuant to s 7 of the Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 (the Act).
2. The application is made by Mr Crannis, a resident of 10 Caroline Street, Orange concerning a tree on a neighbouring property, 14 Rose Street, owned by Mr Flood.
3. The tree is a Himalayan Cedar (Cedrus deodara) (the tree) which is approximately 18 m tall. It has equally tall co-dominant leaders which join approximately 2.5 m above the ground.
4. The tree has, in the past, lost a significant branch towards Mr Crannis's property. The junction of that now removed branch and the trunk of the tree exhibits significant signs of included bark between that branch and the adjacent leader at the point of failure. This appears to have caused the failure.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate