NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Tunwish Pty Ltd v Port Stephens Council [2009] NSWLEC 1213
APPLICANT Tunwish Pty Ltd PARTIES : RESPONDENT Port Stephens Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10753 of 2008
CORAM: Acting Registrar Gray
KEY ISSUES: COSTS :- Amended Application
Civil Procedure Act 2005 LEGISLATION CITED: Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 Land and Environment Court Rules 2007
DATES OF HEARING: 23 February 2009
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 26 February 2009
APPLICANT Mr CR Ireland SOLICITORS LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: O'Sullivan Saddington RESPONDENT Mr P W Larkin SOLICITORS Harris Wheeler
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
ACTING REGISTRAR GRAY
THURSDAY 26 FEBRUARY 2009
08/10753 Tunwish Pty Ltd v Port Stephens Council
JUDGMENT
1 ACTING REGISTRAR: This is an application made by the respondent for costs. The respondent asks firstly for its costs thrown away as a result of an Amended Application being filed by the applicant, and secondly for its costs of the Notice of Motion filed by the respondent seeking leave to file the Amended Application.
2 The substantive proceedings arise from the decision of council granting development consent for the use of the subject property, a hotel premises, as a place of public entertainment subject to conditions. Specifically, the applicant seeks to appeal against the decision of the council to impose condition 4, which condition restricts the opening hours for the place of public entertainment. The applicant says that the hotel currently operates in longer opening hours than those allowed for in condition 4, and that therefore they should not be restricted to using the property as a place of public entertainment in hours more limited than those for which the hotel itself is open. In its Amended Statement of Facts and Contentions filed 19 November 2008, the applicant relies on development consents granted by the council in 1980 and 1988. The applicant asserts that these consents do not impose a restriction on the hotel trading hours.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate