NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Milne v Minister for Planning & Anor [No. 3] [2007] NSWLEC 81
APPLICANT Katie Milne
PARTIES : FIRST RESPONDENT Minister for Planning
SECOND RESPONDENT Rivercolt Pty Ltd
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10408 of 2006
CORAM: Jagot J
KEY ISSUES: Appeal :- designated development - Council not consent authority - subpoena to Council - claim for expenses in complying with subpoena
Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000 Pt 16 LEGISLATION CITED: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 s 39(4), s 63 Land and Environment Court Rules 1996 Pt 4 r 4A, Pt 6 r 1(1) Supreme Court Rules 1970 Pt 37 r 11
Danieletto v Khera (1995) 35 NSWLR 684; Fuelxpress Ltd v LM Ericsson Pty Ltd (1987) 75 ALR 284; CASES CITED: Hagan and Others v Waterhouse and Others [No 2] (1992) 34 NSWLR 400; Marsden v Amalgamated Television Services Pty Ltd [2001] NSWSC 77; Milne v Minister for Planning & Anor [2006] NSWLEC 745; Triotas Pty Ltd v Rohn, NSWSC, unreported, 20 May 1993, Young J
DATES OF HEARING: 30/1/2007, 6/2/2007, 7/2/2007
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 26 February 2007
APPLICANT Mr A Oshlack (agent) SOLICITORS N/A
FIRST RESPONDENT No Appearance SOLICITORS Legal Services Branch - Department of Planning LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: SECOND RESPONDENT No Appearance SOLICITORS Bartier Perry
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate