NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Port Macquarie – Hastings Council v Lawlor Services Pty Limited, Port Macquarie – Hastings Council v Petro (No 3) [2007] NSWLEC 410
PROSECUTOR Port Macquarie – Hastings Council PARTIES : FIRST DEFENDANT Lawlor Services Pty Limited SECOND DEFENDANT Edmund Petro
FILE NUMBER(S) : 50031 of 2006, 50006 of 2007
CORAM: Pain J
KEY ISSUES: Evidence :- Opinion Evidence - whether expert witness should be allowed to give oral evidence despite non-compliance with Supreme Court Rules 1970 Pt 75 r 3J.
Evidence Act 1995 s 79 LEGISLATION CITED: Land and Environment Court Rules 1996 Pt 6 r 2 Supreme Court Rules 1970 Pt 75 r 3J Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005
Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Rich (2005) 190 FLR 242; Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Rich (2005) 218 ALR 764; Commonwealth Development Bank of Australia Pty Limited & Anor v Cassegrain [2002] NSWSC 980; CASES CITED: Makita (Australia) Pty Ltd v Sprowles (2001) 52 NSWLR 705; Norvill v Stokes [2006] NSWLEC 622; Portal v Bodsworth [2005] NSWSC 1228; R v Li (2003) 139 A Crim R 281; United Rural Enterprises Pty Ltd v Lopman Pty Ltd & Ors (2003) NSWSC 870
DATES OF HEARING: 6 June 2007
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate