NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Innis Holdings v Manly Council [2007] NSWLEC 878
APPLICANT Innis Holdings PARTIES : RESPONDENT Manly Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10365 of 2007
CORAM: Murrell C
KEY ISSUES: Appeal :- Judgment No. 2 on s 94 Contribution - fair and reasonable - Newbury Test
LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Manly Section 94 Contributions Plan 2004
CASES CITED: Lake Macquarie City Council v Hammersmith Management Pty Ltd [2003] NSW CA 313; Russo v Burwood Municipal Council CA
DATES OF HEARING: 11/09/2007, 12/09/2007, 13/09/2007 and 03/12/2007
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 3 December 2007
APPLICANT Mr A. Galasso, SC Instructed by T. Sattler of Sattler & Assoc LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:
RESPONDENT Ms S. Duggan, barrister Instructed by Ms R. Vickers of Pike Pike and Fenwick
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Murrell C
3 December 2007
10365 of 2007 Innis Holdings v Manly Council
JUDGMENT 1 This is a second judgment in these proceedings. The first judgment I delivered on 20 September 2007, on the merits of the development application. As agreed by the parties, I was to deliver the merits of the application prior to the parties proceeding to make submissions with respect to the s 94 issue. As such, today I am in a position to issue the formal Orders of the Court for the appeal, including the s 94 matter and the conditions required in terms of the previous judgment that I delivered.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate