NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Weerasekera v Sainty [2009] NSWLEC 1417
APPLICANT Vajira Weerasekera PARTIES : RESPONDENT P Sainty
FILE NUMBER(S) : 20644 of 2009
CORAM: Fakes C
KEY ISSUES: TREES (NEIGHBOURS) :- Removal of Trees, Damage to property, Risk of injury to persons
LEGISLATION CITED: Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006
CASES CITED: Yang v Scerri [2007] NSWLEC 592
DATES OF HEARING: 14 December 2009
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 14 December 2009
APPLICANT Mr V Weerasekra (litigant in person)
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Ms T Buckley (litigant in person) for Ms Sainty
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Fakes C
14 December 2009
20644 of 2009 Vajira Weerasekera v P Sainty
JUDGMENT
This decision was given as an extemporaneous decision. It has been revised and edited prior to publication. 1 COMMISSIONER: This is an application pursuant to s 7 of the Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 made by Mr Vajira Weerasekera of 31 Clissold Road Wahroonga against the owner of four trees growing along the rear side northern boundary of 29 Clissold Road. The owner of that property is Miss P Sainty. Miss Sainty was represented by her niece, Ms Trisha Buckley.
2 The trees are identified and numbered from west to east as 1 – Liquidambar styraciflua (Liquidambar), 2 – Pittosporum undulatum (Native Daphne), 3 – Eucalyptus scoparia (Wallangarra White Gum) and 4 – Syncarpia glomulifera (Turpentine).
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate