NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 175 LGERA 1
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Wei v Parramatta City Council [2010] NSWLEC 1046
APPLICANT Xing Xing Wei PARTIES : RESPONDENT Parramatta City Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10826 of 2009
CORAM: Pearson C
KEY ISSUES: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION :- Brothel
Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 LEGISLATION CITED: Local Government Act 1993 Sydney Regional Environmental Plan No 28 - Parramatta Parramatta Development Control Plan Sex Services and Restricted Premises
Newbury District Council v Secretary of State for the Environment [1911] AC 578 CASES CITED: Stockland Development Pty Ltd v Manly Council [2004] NSWLEC 472 Terrace Tower Holdings Pty Ltd v Sutherland Shire Council (2003) 129 LGERA 195 Wei v Parramatta City Council [2008] NSWLEC 1157
DATES OF HEARING: 19 February 2010
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 17 March 2010
APPLICANT Mr M Baird, barrister instructed by Mr B Barrak LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: of Barrak Lawyers
RESPONDENT Mr P Marincowitz, solicitor of Sparke Helmore
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Commissioner Pearson
17 March 2010
10826 of 2009 Xing Xing Wei v Parramatta City Council
JUDGMENT 1 Commissioner: This is an appeal pursuant to s97 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (the EPA Act) against the deemed refusal of development application DA/512/2009 seeking approval for the intensification of an approved brothel at Lot 180 DP 14244, 19 Brodie Street Rydalmere. 2 The premises have operated as a brothel with two service rooms and two sex workers pursuant to a development consent granted in consent orders by the Court in 2008: Wei v Parramatta City Council [2008] NSWLEC 1157. That consent included provision of one car space on site. In this application the applicant sought approval for three service rooms, three sex workers, and alterations to the first floor layout to divide the waiting area into two separate waiting rooms. The proposed third service room is currently used as a change room, and the application will require the installation of a shower in that room. It was apparent on the site view that the work to divide the waiting area into two separate waiting rooms has already been carried out, and leave was granted during the hearing to amend the application.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate