NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Gerondal v Eurobodalla Shire Council [2009] NSWLEC 160
APPELLANT PARTIES : Paul Gerondal RESPONDENT Eurobodalla Shire Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 60002 of 2009
CORAM: Pain J
KEY ISSUES: APPEAL :- appeal against conviction in local court - whether use of residential property as waste facility without consent - whether material on land is waste - whether appropriate not to record conviction under s 10 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 - whether order of magistrate requiring removal of items should be varied
Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 s 31, 37, 39, 49, Sch 1 LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 s 10 Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 s 144, 217, 218, 243, 245
Advanced Arbor Service Pty Ltd v Strathfield Municipal Council [2006] NSWLEC 485 Chokr v Liverpool City Council [2008] NSWLEC 58 CASES CITED: Cooper v Coffs Harbour City Council (1997) 97 LGERA 125 Environment Protection Authority v HTT Huntley Heritage Pty Ltd (2003) 125 LGERA 332 Franks v Woollahra Municipal Council [2007] NSWLEC 461
TEXTS CITED: The Macquarie Dictionary, 3rd ed (Macquarie University, Sydney: The Macquarie Library Pty Ltd, 2001)
DATES OF HEARING: 1 September 2009
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 25 September 2009
APPELLANT In person LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr A Warren (solicitor) SOLICITORS Andrew Warren Associates
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate