NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Polden Mark v Wollongong City Council [2007] NSWLEC 550
PARTIES : Mark Polden Wollongong City Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 40011 of 2007
CORAM: Talbot J
KEY ISSUES: Costs :- Discontinuance following satisfaction of the claim by interaction with a third party.
LEGISLATION CITED: Land and Environment Court Rules 1996, Pt 15, r 7
CASES CITED: Grant v Kiama Municipal Council [2006] NSWLEC 70 ; Re Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs, Commonwealth of Australia; Ex parte Lai Qin (1997) 186 CLR 622
DATES OF HEARING: 16 August 2007
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 16 August 2007
APPLICANT Ms Duggan (Barrister) SOLICITORS LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: Pike Pike and Fenwick RESPONDENT Mr Pickles (Barrister) SOLICITORS Kells The Lawyers
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Talbot J
16 August 2007
POLDEN, MARK v WOLLONGONG CITY COUNCIL
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT 1 Talbot J: These proceedings were commenced by Class 4 application. The relief sought by the applicant was a declaration that a development consent granted on 3 October 2006 is void and of no force and effect. The only further relief was an order that the respondent be restrained from issuing a construction certificate pursuant to the development consent. The only respondent at all times was Wollongong City Council. The person who was the holder of the development consent, the subject of the application, was not joined in the proceedings.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate