NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Hinde v Anderson and anor [2009] NSWLEC 1148 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
APPLICANT Judith Hinde PARTIES : RESPONDENTS Lynn & Sidney Anderson
FILE NUMBER(S) : 20167 of 2009
CORAM: Moore SC - Thyer AC
KEY ISSUES: JURISDICTION - PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - TREES (NEIGHBOURS) :-
LEGISLATION CITED: Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006
Hinde v Anderson [2007] NSWLEC 847 Agius v Forrester [2008] NSWLEC 256 CASES CITED: Agius v Forrester [2007] NSWLEC 857 Agius v Forrester [2008] NSWLEC 1434 Robson v Leischke [2008] NSWLEC 152; [2008] 159 LGERA 280
TEXTS CITED: The Doctrine of Res Judicata, Spencer Bower, Turner and Handley, 3rd Edition
DATES OF HEARING: 6 May 2009
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 18 May 2009
RESPONDENT ON THE MOTION (APPLICANT) Mr A GAlasso SC INSTRUCTED BY Deacons LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: APPLICANT ON THE MOTION (RESPONDENTS) Mr P Tomassetti SC INSTRUCTED BY Slade Mainwaring
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
MOORE SC THYER AC
18 May 2009
20167 of 2009 Judith Hinde v Lynn & Sidney Anderson
JUDGMENT 1 COMMISSIONERS: Trees, whether living or dead, are evolving, changing dynamic structures. Living trees may grow, flower, fruit or react to climatic changes such as drought. They are also susceptible to attack from a variety of organisms large and small – from microbial fungi through human beings to pachyderms.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate