NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 167 LGERA 178
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Birdon Contracting Pty Ltd v Hawkesbury City Council [2009] NSWLEC 91
PARTIES : Birdon Contracting Pty Ltd (Applicant) Hawkesbury City Council (Respondent)
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10967 of 2008
CORAM: Lloyd J
APPEAL :- LOCAL GOVERNMENT: - appeal against council order to comply with condition of development consent - condition required payment of contributions under s 94 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act - construction of the condition - power of council to make order to rectify past breach of condition - power of council to make order requiring payment of money due under condition
KEY ISSUES: CONSTRUCTION AND INTERPRETATION :- s 14(1)(d) and s 15 of the Limitation Act 1969 - s 121B order not an "action" subject to limitation period - money due under development condition and s 121B order is not "recoverable by virtue of an enactment" - proceedings to recover money due under the development condition and s 121B order in question would not constitute an "action on a cause of action for an account"
DISCRETION :- consideration of prejudice to applicant caused by council's delay in making s 121B order
LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 s 94, s 121B(1) Limitation Act 1969 s 14(1)(b), s 14(1)(d), s 15
Aylott v West Ham Corporation [1927] 1 Ch 30 Brisbane South Regional Health Authority v Taylor (1996) 186 CLR 541 Central Electricity Board v Halifax Corp [1963] AC 785 Ceric v C E Heath Underwriting & Insurance (Australia) Pty Ltd (1993) 91 NTR 26 at 32 Chan Yee Kin v Minister for Immigration, Local Government and Ethnic Affairs [1989] FCA 511 Daemar v Industrial Commission of New South Wales [No. 2] (1990) 22 NSWLR 178 Davis v Hueber (1923) 31 CLR 583 De Rossi v Walker (1902) 2 SR(NSW) 249 Do Carmo v Ford Excavations Pty Ltd (1984) 154 CLR 234 Dobinson v Lake Macquarie City Council (1994) 82 LGERA 16 CASES CITED: Frost v The Speaker of the Legislative Assembly of New South Wales [2000] NSWIRComm 70; (2000) 97 IR 461 J & J O'Brien Pty Ltd v South Sydney City Council [2002] NSWCA 259; (2002) 121 LGERA 223 King v Rossett (1827) 2 Y & J 33 [148 ER 820] North Eastern Railway Company v Martin (1848) 2 Ph 758 [41 ER 1136] Public Trustee v Schultz [1973] 1 NSWLR 564 R v Chong: Ex Parte Chong [1999] QCA 314; [2001] 2 Qd R 301 Rapid Metal Developments (Australia) Pty Ltd v Rosato [1971] Qd R 82 Re GDK Financial Solutions Pty Ltd [2006] FCA 1415; (2006) 236 ALR 699 Registrar-General v Cleaver (1996) 41 NSWLR 713 South Eastern Sydney Area Health Service v Gadiry [2002] NSWCA 161; (2002) 54 NSWLR 495 State Government Insurance Commission v Teal (1990) 2 WAR 105 Sullivan v Oil Company of Australia Ltd [2001] QCA 252; [2002] 2 Qd R 94
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate