NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : KSK Developments Pty Limited v Murray Shire Council [2009] NSWLEC 43
APPLICANT PARTIES : KSK Developments Pty Limited RESPONDENT Murray Shire Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 11623 of 2008
CORAM: Pain J
KEY ISSUES: CONSTRUCTION AND INTERPRETATION :- meaning of "bed" and "bank" under LEP - application of purposive approach to statutory construction
Crown Lands Consolidation Act 1913 (Cth) Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 s 26 LEGISLATION CITED: Interpretation Act 1987 s 5(6), s33 Murray Local Environmental Plan 1989 cl 2, cl 5, cl 9, cl 10, cl 30 State Environmental Planning Policy No 1— Development Standards
Commonwealth v Baume (1905) 2 CLR 405 CASES CITED: Comserv (No 1877) Pty Ltd v Figtree Gardens Caravan Park & Ors (1999) 102 LGERA 74 Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority (1998) 194 CLR 355 The State of Alabama v The State of Georgia 64 US 505 (1859)
TEXTS CITED: Macquarie Dictionary (Revised third edition, 2001) Statutory Interpretation in Australia, D C Pearce and R S Geddes 6th ed LexisNexis, Australia, 2006
DATES OF HEARING: 2 April 2009
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 6 April 2009
APPLICANT Mr P Tomasetti SC with Mr N Eastman SOLICITOR LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: Cosgriff Orchard Legal RESPONDENT Ms S Duggan SOLICITOR Kell Moore
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate