NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Ramplin v Pink [2008] NSWLEC 1200 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
APPLICANT John Ramplin PARTIES : RESPONDENT Kimberley Pink
FILE NUMBER(S) : 21342 of 2007
CORAM: Thyer AC
KEY ISSUES: Trees (Neighbours) :- Pruning of tree, risk of injury to people, property damage
LEGISLATION CITED: Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006
DATES OF HEARING: 08/05/2008
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 8 May 2008
APPLICANT Mr J. Loughnan, solicitor of Harris Wheeler Lawyers LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:
RESPONDENT Mr M. Evers, solicitor of Michael Evers & Co
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Thyer AC
8 May 2008
21342 of 2007 John Ramplin v Kimberley Pink
JUDGMENT The decision was given at the hearing on 8 May 2008. This written judgment reflects the background information and the findings. 1 ACTING COMMISSIONER: Mr Ramplin and his neighbour Mr Pink live in older, modest cottages in Steel Street, Redhead, a beachside village near Newcastle. Mr Ramplin's front yard has no trees and the lawn is neatly kept.
2 Mr Pink and his family have native trees in their yard. Their largest tree is a Blue Gum about 12 m tall, planted 22 years ago to commemorate the birth of their first child. This tree, growing close to the common boundary in the front yard is the cause of Mr Ramplin's concerns.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate