NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Williams v NSW Minister for Planning (No 3) [2010] NSWLEC 204
APPLICANT: Neville "Chappie" Williams
PARTIES : FIRST RESPONDENT: NSW Minister for Planning
SECOND RESPONDENT: Barrick (Cowal) Ltd
FILE NUMBER(S) : 40890 of 2009
CORAM: Biscoe J
KEY ISSUES: JUDICIAL REVIEW :- challenge to validity of modifications to development consent for a gold mine granted by Minister – whether Minister failed to consider mandatory relevant matters – whether Minister satisfied that the consent as modified was substantially the same development as the development for which the consent was originally granted – whether Minister motivated by a collateral purpose.
LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, Part 3A, ss 75I, 75J, 75W, 79C, 96 Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000
Barrick Australia Ltd v Williams [2009] NSWCA 275, 74 NSWLR 733 Foster v Minister for Customs and Justice [2000] HCA 38, 200 CLR 442 Gales Holdings Pty Ltd v Minister for Infrastructure and Planning [2006] NSWCA 388, 69 NSWLR 156 Kindimindi Investments Pty Ltd v Lane Cove Council [2006] NSWCCA 23, 143 LGERA 277 Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Ltd [1986] HCA 40, 162 CLR 24 CASES CITED: Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZMDS [2010] HCA 16, 240 CLR 611 Minister for Local Government v South Sydney City Council [2002] NSWCA 288, 55 NSWLR 381 Minister for Planning v Walker [2008] NSWCA 224, 161 LGERA 423 Tugun Cobaki Alliance Inc v Minister for Planning and RTA [2006] NSWLEC 396 Walker v Minister for Planning [2007] NSWLEC 741, 157 LGERA 124 Williams v Minister for Planning [2009] NSWLEC 5, 164 LGERA 204
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate