NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Pearse v Sharpe & Anor (No 2) [2008] NSWLEC 81
APPLICANTS Mark Thomas Pearse and Cheryl Ann Pearse
PARTIES : FIRST RESPONDENTS Ranald William Sharpe and Leigh Ann Sharpe
SECOND RESPONDENT Sutherland Shire Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 40596 of 2007
CORAM: Jagot J
KEY ISSUES: Costs :- whether order for costs should be made in favour of the Council - whether the Council should not have taken any active role in the proceedings - Council's role reasonable in all the circumstances - applicant ordered to pay the Council's costs
LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
CASES CITED: Pearse v Sharpe & Anor [2007] NSWLEC 710
DATES OF HEARING: 19 February 2008
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 19 February 2008
APPLICANTS Mr D Wilson SOLICITORS Hannaford Lawyers
FIRST RESPONDENTS LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: N/A SOLICITORS N/A
SECOND RESPONDENT Mr J A Ayling SC SOLICITORS Home Wilkinson Lowry
JUDGMENT:
THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Jagot J
19 February 2008
40596 of 2007
MARK THOMAS PEARSE CHERYL ANN PEARSE Applicants
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate