NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Hooper v Port Stephens Council (No 5) [2010] NSWLEC 194
APPLICANT: Stephen James Hooper
PARTIES : FIRST RESPONDENT: Port Stephens Council
SECOND RESPONDENT: Trevlyn Peter Hallett
FILE NUMBER(S) : 40010 of 2010
CORAM: Biscoe J
KEY ISSUES: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE :- whether necessary or appropriate to order that orders not be entered where under statutory regime if a notice of motion to set aside or vary an order is made within 14 days after it is entered, the court may determine the matter as if it had not been entered.
LEGISLATION CITED: Land and Environment Court Rules 2007, r 7.6 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, rr 36.11, 36.16
CASES CITED: Hooper v Port Stephens Council & Anor (No 3) [2010] NSWLEC 178 Hooper v Port Stephens Council (No 4) [2010] NSWLEC 186
DATES OF HEARING: 1 October 2010
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 1 October 2010
APPLICANT: Mr Stephen Hooper (in person)
FIRST RESPONDENT: Mr M Fraser, barrister LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: SOLICITORS Harris Wheeler
SECOND RESPONDENT: Mr P Larkin, barrister SOLICITORS Equilaw Solicitors
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate