NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Zhu v Auburn Council [2009] NSWLEC 97
APPELLANT PARTIES : Ling Ling Zhu RESPONDENT Auburn Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 60018 of 2008
CORAM: Pain J
KEY ISSUES: APPEAL :- appeal on severity of sentence and award of prosecutor's costs in local court - appellant committed two offences of carrying out development without consent - plea of guilty in local court - leave granted to rely on new evidence - s 10A order not appropriate given scope of work - consideration of means to pay - totality principle applied
Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001s 3, 31(1), 37(1), 39(2), 47(1), 49(2) LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 s3A, 10A, 21A Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 s76A, 125(1) Fines Act 1996 s 6
Axer Pty Ltd v Environment Protection Authority (1993) 113 LGERA 357 Bentley v BGP Properties Pty Ltd (2006) 145 LGERA 234 Blue Mountains City Council v Carlon [2008] NSWLEC 296 Camilleri's Stock Feeds Pty Ltd v Environment Protection Authority (1993) 32 NSWLR 683 CASES CITED: Franks v Woollahra Municipal Council [2007] NSWLEC 461 Gittany Constructions Pty Ltd v Sutherland Shire Council (2006) 145 LGERA 189 Johnson v R (2004) 205 ALR 346 Mosman Municipal Council v Menai Excavations Pty Ltd (2002) 122 LGERA 89 Willoughby City Council v P and V Masonry Pty Limited [2003] NSWLEC 312
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate