NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Mace v Graham [2007] NSWLEC 485
APPLICANT Robbie-Anne Mace PARTIES : RESPONDENT Necia Graham
FILE NUMBER(S) : 20493 of 2007
CORAM: Moore C - Thyer AC
KEY ISSUES: Trees (Neighbours) - Neighbour Application :- Nuts and palm fronds
LEGISLATION CITED: Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006
CASES CITED: Barker v Kyriakides [2007] NSWLEC 292
DATES OF HEARING: 30 July 2007
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 30 July 2007
APPLICANT In person LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT In person
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
MOORE C THYER AC
30 July 2007
07/20493 Robbie-Anne Mace v Necia Graham
JUDGMENT
This decision was given as an extemporaneous decision. It has been revised and edited prior to publication. 1 COMMISSIONERS: This is an application pursuant to s 7 of the Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 (the Act) concerning two trees located on a property at 8 Judd Street, Mount Hutton. This property is owned by Ms Necia Graham.
2 The trees are Cocos Palms (Arecastrum romanzoffianum) (the trees).
3 The application has been made by Ms Robbie-Anne Mace, the neighbour to the east. Her application seeks orders from the Court for "the trees to be totally cut down".
4 The relevant provisions of s 10(2)(a) and (b) of the Act require that the Court be satisfied that one or more of four conditions are met, with respect to each tree subject of an application, before the Court has jurisdiction to consider the application concerning that tree.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate