NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Baulkham Hills Shire Council v Stankovic (No 5) [2008] NSWLEC 327
APPLICANT PARTIES : Baulkham Hills Shire Council RESPONDENT Milovan Stankovic
FILE NUMBER(S) : 41243 of 2004
CORAM: Pain J
Practice and Procedure :- whether Court should set aside 2005 costs order pursuant to Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 - whether order made irregularly under r 36.15 - operation of time bar in r 36.16 KEY ISSUES: Discretion :- whether Court should exercise discretion to set aside costs order entered in 2005 and enforced in local court proceedings
LEGISLATION CITED: Legal Profession Act 2004 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (UCPR), r 36.15, r 36.16 and r 36.4
Autodesk Inc v Dyason [No 2] (1992) 176 CLR 300 Baulkham Hills Shire Council v Stankovic & Anor [2005] NSWLEC 110 CASES CITED: Baulkham Hills Shire Council v Stankovic (No 2) [2007] NSWLEC 870 Baulkham Hills Shire Council v Stankovic (No 3) [2008] NSWLEC 266 Baulkham Hills Shire Council v Stankovic (No 4) [2008] NSWLEC 273 De L v Director General New South Wales Department of Community Services [No 2] (1997) 190 CLR 207
TEXTS CITED: LexisNexis Butterworths, Ritchie's Uniform Civil Procedure NSW (Service 30), [36.15.10] and [36.15.15]
DATES OF HEARING: 10 December 2008
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 19 December 2008
APPLICANT Mr G Newport SOLICITORS LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: Baulkham Hills Shire Council
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate