NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court CITATION : Lakatoi v Walker [1999] NSWSC 1088 CURRENT JURISDICTION : Equity Division, Commercial List FILE NUMBER(S) : 50035/98, 50110/98, 50109/98 HEARING DATE(S) : 30 September 1999 JUDGMENT DATE : 12 November 1999
50035/98 Lakatoi Universal Pty Limited & ors (Plaintiffs) PARTIES : Langley Alexander Walker & ors (Defendants) 50110/98 & 50109/98 Ensile Pty Limited (Plaintiff) Walker Consolidated Investments Pty Ltd & ors (Defendants) JUDGMENT OF : Einstein J
COUNSEL : R J Ellicott QC, V R W Gray, S Ocampo (Plaintiffs) D P F Officer QC, R Powell, C J Leggat (Defendants) SOLICITORS : Gye Associates (Plaintiffs) Perkes & Stone (Defendants) CATCHWORDS : PRACTICE - Cross-examination by two Counsel - Principles applicable to inform discretion - Materiality of mode in which Commercial List is administered. ACTS CITED : Evidence Act (1995) (NSW) ss 11(1), 26 Uniform Evidence Act Eva Pty Limited v Charles Davis Limited (1982) VR 515 CASES CITED : GPI Leisure v Herdsman Investments No 3 (1990) 20 NSWLR 15 Hadid v Australis Media, [unreported Supreme Court of New South Wales, Sperling J, 11 November 1996] Phillips v Phillips [1966] 1 NSWR 49 DECISION : Leave granted to the defendants to further cross-examine Mr Hogarth by either Mr Officer QC or Mr Powell on areas and materials previously not covered by the cross-examination of Mr Shand, but permitting further cross-examination on credit generally.
THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION - COMMERCIAL LIST
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate