NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal CITATION : LLOYD v VETERINARY SURGEONS INVESTIGATING COMMITTEE & ANOR [1999] NSWCA 68 FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40196/99 HEARING DATE(S) : 19 and 22 March 1999 JUDGMENT DATE : 25 March 1999
PARTIES : Ronald George Lloyd v Veterinary Surgeons Investigating Committee and TCN Channel 9 JUDGMENT OF : Mason P at 1; Priestley JA at 2; Stein JA at 27
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : Administrative Decisions Tribunal LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 40004/98 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER : O'Connor J
Claimant - D. Inverarity COUNSEL : Opponent 1 (VSIC) - S.J. Burchett Opponent 2 (TCN 9) - T.D. Blackburn Claimant - Hermann & Green SOLICITORS : Opponent 1 - Conway MacCallum Opponent 2 - Gilbert & Tobin CATCHWORDS : See note re section 126 of the Administrative Tribunals Act re non publication of any identifying matter; Application for relief in the nature of prerogative relief; Supreme Court Act s 69; Availability of appellate review in Tribunal below; Case not appropriate for consideration by Supreme Court until after appellate procedure below followed out. Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997 ACTS CITED : Supreme Court Act 1970 Veterinary Surgeons Act 1986 DECISION : Summons dismissed with costs
THE SUPREME COURT
OF NEW SOUTH WALES
COURT OF APPEAL
CA 40196/99 ADT 40004/98
MASON P PRIESTLEY JA STEIN JA
Thursday, 25 March 1999
WARNING : Section 126 of the Administrative Tribunals Act may apply to this case. Its terms are summarised in par 4 of the court's reasons. LLOYD v VETERINARY SURGEONS INVESTIGATING
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate