NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court CITATION : Marsden v Amalgamated Television Services Pty Limited [1999] NSWSC 1119 CURRENT JURISDICTION : Common Law FILE NUMBER(S) : 20223 of 1995; 20592 of 1996 HEARING DATE(S) : 15 November 1999 JUDGMENT DATE : 15 November 1999
JOHN MARSDEN (Plaintiff)
PARTIES : v
AMALGAMATED TELEVISION SERVICES PTY LIMITED (Defendant) JUDGMENT OF : Levine J
P Donohoe Q.C. M Hall COUNSEL : (Plaintiff)
W H Nicholas Q.C. (Defendant) Marsdens (Plaintiff) SOLICITORS : Mallesons Stephen Jaques (Defendant) CATCHWORDS : Admissibility of evidence - good reputation - "relevant sector" Anderson v Mirror Newspapers Limited (1986) 5 NSWLR 735 Bickel v John Fairfax & Sons Limited (1981) 2 NSWLR 474 Hobbs v C.T. Tingling & Co Limited (1929) 2 KB 1 CASES CITED : Morosi v Mirror Newspapers Limited (1977) 2 NSWLR 749 Plato Films v Speidel Limited & Ors (1961) AC 1090 Television NZ v Prebble (1993) 3 NZLR 513 Uren v John Fairfax & Sons Limited (1965-1966) 117 CLR 118 DECISION : See paragraph 33
DLJT: 53 (Ex Tempore - Revised) THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION DEFAMATION LIST No. 20223 of 1995 No. 20592 of 1996
JUSTICE DAVID LEVINE
MONDAY 15 NOVEMBER 1999
JOHN MARSDEN (Plaintiff)
v
AMALGAMATED TELEVISION SERVICES PTY LIMITED ACN 000 145 246 (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate