NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : (2000) ATPR 41-737
New South Wales Court of Appeal CITATION : HAMPIC PTY LTD v ADAMS [1999] NSWCA 455 FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40691/97 HEARING DATE(S) : 12 August 1999 JUDGMENT DATE : 10 December 1999
PARTIES : HAMPIC PTY LTD v JANETTE BARBARA ADAMS JUDGMENT OF : Mason P at 1; Giles JA at 66; Davies AJA at 1
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 9/93 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER : McDonnell ADCJ
COUNSEL : Appellant: D L Davies SC and K Smark Respondent: G Graham and T Bates SOLICITORS : Appellant: Phillips Fox, Sydney Respondent: Borthwick Wilson Smith CATCHWORDS : DAMAGES - Action for damages - Claim under Trade Practices Act s52, s82 - Misleading or deceptive conduct - Inadequacy of product label on cleaning substance - Employee suffered injury - Requirement of causation - No requirement that damages can be recovered only where the applicant relies directly upon the conduct of the party constituting contravention of the relevant provision; DAMAGES - Application for reduction of damages - Application of Workers Compensation Act 1987 s151Z - Apportionment of liability between manufacturer and employer - Causative impact of their respective actions - Common liability not destroyed by the way the cause of action was framed DECISION : Appeal allowed in part; See par 65
THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL CA 40691/97 DC (Newcastle) 9/93 MASON P GILES JA DAVIES AJA
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate