NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : (2000) 20 NSWCCR 687
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : Athval Management Pty Ltd v Doherty [2000] NSWCA 277 revised - 12/10/2000 FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40939/99 HEARING DATE(S) : 6 October 2000 JUDGMENT DATE : 6 October 2000
PARTIES : Athval Management Pty Ltd (Appellant) Sonja Doherty (Respondent) JUDGMENT OF : Powell JA at 1, 33, 35; Stein JA at 34; Heydon JA at 2
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : Compensation Court LOWER COURT CC 44438/98 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Bishop CCJ JUDICIAL OFFICER :
COUNSEL : J D Hislop QC/Miss J C Chapman (Appellant) A D M Hewitt SC SOLICITORS : McCulloch & Buggy (Appellant) Lamrocks (Respondent) CATCHWORDS : Workers Compensation - entitlement to compensation for physical injury - error of law - misdirection - non-direction - trial judge's failure to make a finding of fact - meaning of "journey" as defined by s 10(4) Workers Compensation Act 1987 - interaction of s 10(4) with the intention of the worker at the time of the commencement of the journey. LEGISLATION CITED : Workers Compensation Act 1987 Compensation Court Act 1984 Azzopardi v Tasman UEB Industries Ltd (1985) 4 NSWLR 139 CASES CITED: Williams v Ducon Condenser Ltd [1949] WCR 122 Kerr v New South Wales Club [1971] WCR 13 The Australian Gaslight Co v The Valuer-General (1940) 40 SR (NSW) 126 DECISION : See para 32
THE SUPREME COURT
OF NEW SOUTH WALES
COURT OF APPEAL
CA 40939/99 CC 44438/98
POWELL JA STEIN JA HEYDON JA
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate