NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : Regina v Hoon; Regina v Pouoa [2000] NSWCCA 137 FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60073/00; 60075/00 HEARING DATE(S) : 19 April 2000 JUDGMENT DATE : 19 April 2000
PARTIES : Regina v Jade Elizabeth Hoon Regina v Aigailetai Pouoa JUDGMENT OF : Stein JA at 1; Dunford J at 37; Simpson J at 47
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : DC 99/11/0638 DC 99/11/0699 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL Goldring DCJ OFFICER :
D C Frearson (Crown) COUNSEL : R W Burgess (Respondent - Hoon) C B Craigie (Respondent - Pouoa) S E O'Connor (Crown) SOLICITORS : Brenda Duchen (Respondent - Hoon) Nikola Velcic & Associates (Respondent - Pouoa) CATCHWORDS : CRIMINAL LAW - drug trafficking - Crown appeal against inadequacy of sentence - error of principle - general deterrence - subjective considerations - manifest inadequacies LEGISLATION CITED : Criminal Appeal Act 1912, s 5D Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985, s 25A(1) Everett v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 295 Griffiths v The Queen (1977) 137 CLR 293 CASES CITED: Malvaso v The Queen (1989) 168 CLR 227 R v Allpass (1994) 72 A Crim R 561 R v Baker [2000] NSWCCA 85 DECISION : Appeals dismissed
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
60073/00 60075/00 STEIN JA DUNFORD J SIMPSON J Wednesday, 19 April 2000 Regina v Jade Elizabeth HOON Regina v Aigailetai POUOA JUDGMENT
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate