NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : Strata Consolidated v Bradshaw [2000] NSWCA 114 FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40324/98 29 October 1999 HEARING DATE(S) : 26 November 1999 2 December 1999 JUDGMENT DATE : 5 May 2000
Strata Consolidated (Australia) Pty Limited (1st appellant/opponent) ATA Wholesalers Pty Limited (2nd appellant/opponent) Adtech Corporation (3rd appellant/opponent) Edward John Bradshaw (1st repondent/claimant) Takello Pty Limited (2nd respondent/claimant) Ian Ronald Ney (3rd respondent/claimant) Tartandi Pty Limited (4th respondent/claimant) Procus Australia Pty Limited (5th respondent/claimant) PARTIES : Procus West Pty Limited (6th respondent/claimant) Selmet Pty Limited (7th respondent/claimant) Sipro Pty Limited (8th respondent/claimant) Siska Pty Limited (9th respondent/claimant) Patrick Maguire (10th respondent/claimant) Warren Binney (11th respondent/claimant) Ross Patterson (12th respondent/claimant) John Shanahan (13th respondent/claimant) So Your Self A Favour Co Pty Limited (14th respondent/claimant) JUDGMENT OF : Registrar Jupp
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : Supreme Court LOWER COURT 50304/94 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Hunter J JUDICIAL OFFICER :
Mr P McEwen SC for 1st & 2nd respondents/claimants COUNSEL : Mr P Gray for 3rd to 14th respondents/claimants Mr PM Biscoe QC with Mr SJ Motbey for the appellant/repondents Brook Worthington (1st & 2nd respondents/claimants) SOLICITORS : Stephen Blanks & Associates (3rd to 14th respondents/claimants) J Biady & Associates (appellants/opponents) CATCHWORDS : Security for Costs - Entitlement to an order for security for costs in the Court of Appeal in repect of costs incurred in Court below LEGISLATION CITED : Supreme Court Rules Part 51 rule 16, Part 53 Corporations Law - section 1335 Uptown Sydney Development Corporation Pty Ltd V BNZ (1993)11 ACLC 862 CASES CITED: Chris Poulson Insurance Agencies Pty Ltd v National Mutual Life Association (Sup Ct of Tasmania unreported) Bell Wholesale Co Ltd v Gates Export Corporation (1984) 2 FCR DECISION : Security for costs of the appeal ordered - $90,000 in respect of the costs of the 1st & 2nd respondents; $55,000 in respect of the costs of the 3rd to 14th respondents; appeal stayed till security provided; 80% of the costs of 1st & 2nd respondents motion to be their costs in the appeal; 50% of the costs of the 3rd to 14th respondents motion to be their costs in the appeal; Listed for call-over 7 June 2000.'
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate