NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court CITATION : Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Robyn A C Cochrane & 1Ors [1999] NSWSC 814 CURRENT JURISDICTION : Equity FILE NUMBER(S) : 2980/99 HEARING DATE(S) : 09/08/1999 JUDGMENT DATE : 9 August 1999
Australian Securities and Investments Commission (Plaintiff) PARTIES : Robyn Ann Carrolle Cochrane (First Defendant) Steven Michael Cochrane (Second Defendant JUDGMENT OF : Santow J
COUNSEL : T Lynch (Plaintiff) E A Collins (Second Defendant) SOLICITORS : Jan Redfern, Solicitor for the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (Plaintiff) P J Donnellan & Co (city agent: Wilshire Webb) (Second Defendant) CATCHWORDS : CORPORATIONS LAW — Breach of enforceable undertaking given to ASIC — Injunction restraining giving independent advice without a licence — Compensatory payment by First Defendant for breach of undertaking with respect to loss or damage suffered — Freezing assets of First Defendant.; COSTS — Indemnity costs awarded to Plaintiff in absence of Defendant. ACTS CITED : ASIC Act ss93AA(4)(c) Corporations Law ss780 and 781, s1324(10) CASES CITED : Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336 DECISION : Orders enforcing undertaking with indemnity costs.
REVISED — 11 August, 1999 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES IN EQUITY
SANTOW J
No. 2980/99 AUSTRALIAN SECURITIES AND INVESTMENTS COMMISSION Plaintiff ROBYN ANN CARROLLE COCHRANE First Defendant STEVEN MICHAEL COCHRANE Second Defendant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate