NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal CITATION : Regina v Nelson [1999] NSWCCA 221 FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60062/99 HEARING DATE(S) : 2 August 1999 JUDGMENT DATE : 10 August 1999
PARTIES : Regina v Robert Lloyd Nelson JUDGMENT OF : Newman J at 1; Sperling J at 2; Greg James J at 31
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 97/21/0065; 97/21/0692 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER : Grogan DCJ
COUNSEL : J I Doris (Appellant) P G Berman (Crown) SOLICITORS : Neil J O'Connor & Associates (Appellant) S E O'Connor (Crown)l CATCHWORDS : CRIMINAL LAW - picture identification evidence, whether error in not excluding - whether verdict unsafe and unsatisfactory. ACTS CITED : Evidence Act 1995, ss 115(7), 137 CASES CITED: Cook (1998) 126 NTR 17, Gipp (1998) 194 CLR 106, Jones (1997) 191 CLR 439, M (1994) 181 CLR 487, Richards (CCA (NSW), 27 November 1995, unreported) DECISION : Appeal against conviction dismissed; Application for leave to appeal against sentence dismissed.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 60062/99
NEWMAN J SPERLING J GREG JAMES J
Tuesday 10 August 1999 REGINA v Robert Lloyd NELSON JUDGMENT
1 NEWMAN J: I have had the advantage of reading in draft the reasons for judgment of Justice Sperling and I agree with the reasons he gives and the orders he proposes. **********
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 60062/99
NEWMAN J SPERLING J GREG JAMES J
Tuesday 10 August 1999 REGINA v Robert Lloyd NELSON JUDGMENT
2 SPERLING J: On 16 October 1998, the appellant was convicted of the following offences in a trial before Grogan DCJ and a jury: first, that on 24 June 1996 at Holsworthy he stole motor vehicle registration no. TXM 901; secondly, that on 29 June 1996 at Birrong, being armed, he assaulted Lynne Williams with intent to rob her; thirdly, that on 29 June 1996 at Birrong, being armed, he robbed John Waterson; and, fourthly, that on 29 June 1996, being armed, he robbed Marie Nicolaou. 3 So far as concerns the events of 29 June 1996, the Crown case was as follows. The accused entered the Tuckerbag Supermarket at Birrong. He held a sawn-off shotgun against Ms Williams, an employee, demanding money from a cash register. She noticed a green coloured tattoo on the back of one of the appellant's hands. The cash register failed to open. 4 Another employee, Mr Waterson, was then accosted by the appellant. Money was again demanded and was given to the appellant from one of the cash registers. 5 Another employee, Ms Nicolaou handed over further money on demand. She also noticed a green coloured tattoo on the back of one of the offender's hands. The appellant had tattoos on his hands similar to those described by the witnesses. 6 On 30 June 1996, Mr Waterson made a picture identification of the appellant from eleven photographs shown to him by the police. 7 Many months later, Ms Williams, Ms Nicolaou and another employee who was in the store at the time, Ms Pignat, each, separately, failed to make a positive identification from a video of still photographs, although Ms Nicolaou selected two of the pictures as being similar to the robber, one of which was a picture of the appellant taken on 7 August 1996 after his arrest. 8 The appellant has appealed against the convictions relating to the offences alleged to have occurred on 29 June 1996. The grounds of appeal are as follows.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate