NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court CITATION : Lancedale v Heath [1999] NSWSC 609 CURRENT JURISDICTION : Equity FILE NUMBER(S) : 4373/98 HEARING DATE(S) : 23/4/99 JUDGMENT DATE : 23 June 1999
PARTIES : Lancedale Holdings Pty Limited & Anor v Heath Group Australasia Pty Limited & Anor JUDGMENT OF : Bryson J at 1
COUNSEL : J.D. Heydon QC and I.E. Davidson for Plaintiffs P. Biscoe QC and A. Lo Surdo for Defendants SOLICITORS : Hegarty & Elmgreen for Plaintiffs Norton Smith & Co. for Defendants CATCHWORDS : CONTRACTS - construction of contracts - power of amendment - derogation from accrued rights - Consideration of principle that power to abrogate rights is construed as operating prospectively (Bailey v NSW MDU 184 CLR 399 at 430) - Share Plan enabled Executives to obtain shares in the company - rules of the Share Plan became contractually binding between employer and Executive - Rules conferred power of amendment on a Committee which was appointed by the employer - rules provided for compulsory repurchase at option of employer within sixty days of termination of employment - Executive left employment, option to repurchase was not exercised - after 2 years, Committee amended rules to extend period of option, employer exercised the option and cancelled the shares. Held that the amendment was within the power of amendment and was valid. Bailey v New South Wales Medical Defence Union Limited (1995) 184 CLR 399 at 430 Swabey v Port Darwin Gold Mining Co. (1889) 1 Meg 385 Victrawl Pty Limited v Telstra Corporation Limited (1995) 183 CLR 595 at 620-621 Biotechnology v Pace (1988) 15 NSWLR 130 at 150-151. CASES CITED : Australian Broadcasting Corporation v Australasian Performing Right Association Limited (1973) 129 CLR 99 at pp109-110 Gambotto v. W.C.P. Ltd & Anor (1995) 182 CLR 432 Lock v. Westpac Banking Corporation (1991) 25 NSWLR 593 Lord Napier and Ettric v. R.F. Kershaw Limited [1999] 1 WLR 756 Gra-Ham Australia Pty Ltd v. Perpetual Trustees WA Limited [1989] 1 WAR 65 Kearns v. Hill & Anor (1990) 21 NSWLR 107 DECISION : Dismissed; See Paragraph 75
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate