NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : Regina v Maiden [2000] NSWCCA 519 FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60629/00; 60465/00 HEARING DATE(S) : 24/11/00 JUDGMENT DATE : 13 December 2000
PARTIES : Regina v Stephen Arthur Maiden JUDGMENT OF : Sully J at 1; Whealy J at 2; Howie J
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : Supreme Court; District Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : L96/008; 91/11/1577 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL Dunford J; Gallen DCJ OFFICER :
COUNSEL : L. M. B. Lamprati - Crown P. Boulten - Applicant SOLICITORS : S. E. O'Connor - DDP D. J. Humphreys - Applicant
Sentencing Act 1989 LEGISLATION CITED : Prisons Act 1952 Crimes Act 1914 (C'Wealth) Crimes Act (NSW) Regina v Gary John Stephens (NSWCCA unreported, 2 November 1993 Regina v Johns (1978) 2 NSWLR 259 at 262, 264 Regina v Mai (1992) 26 NSWLR 371 at 380F-G; Regina v Arnold (1993) 30 NSWLR 73 at 85 AB v The Queen (1999) 198 CLR 111 CASES CITED: R v Boreland (unreported CCA 2 August 1994) Regina v Salameh (1999) NSWCCA 300 R v Pearce 194 CLR 610 at 623 Mill v The Queen (1988) 166 CLR 59 R v Purdey (1992) 65 A crim R 441 affirmed by CCA (1993) 31 NSWLR 668, SLR (1994) 181 CLR 691 R v Haggart (unreported, Dunford J, 19 November 1993) DECISION : Appeal against the sentences imposed by Gallen DCJ is refused; Leave to appeal in relation to sentence imposed by Dunford J on 8.4.999 is granted, but appeal is dismissed
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate