NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : [2000] 113 A Crim R 376
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : R v Gee [2000] NSWCCA 198 FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60772/98 HEARING DATE(S) : 17/03/2000 JUDGMENT DATE : 26 May 2000
PARTIES : Stephen Robert Gee (appellant) Regina (respondent) JUDGMENT OF : Spigelman CJ at 1; Grove J at 2; Hidden J at 12
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 97/31/0481 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL Armitage DCJ OFFICER :
COUNSEL : A Webb (appellant) M Grogan (Crown) SOLICITORS : Legal Aid Commission (appellant) Director of Public Prosecutions (respondent) CATCHWORDS : CRIMINAL LAW - Co-incidence evidence - adequacy of directions to jury - Recognition evidence - admissibility of out of court recognition from photos - Crown witnesses' evidence unfavourable LEGISLATION CITED : Evidence Act 1995 R v AH (1997) 42 NSWLR 702 Alexander v The Queen (1981) 145 CLR 395 R v Barbaro & Ors (1993) 67 ACrim R 456 Graham v The Queen (1998) 195 CLR 606 CASES CITED: R v McGuire [1975] 4 WWR 124 R v Mundarra Smith (1999) 47 NSWLR 419 Sutton v The Queen (1983-4) 152 CLR 528 R v Osbourne [1973] QB 678 R v Adam (1999) 47 NSWLR 267 DECISION : Appeal dismissed
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
60772/98
SPIGELMAN CJ GROVE J HIDDEN J
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate